Lee KA, Zaffke ME, McEnany G. 181) organizations based on a SCID analysis of major depressive disorder. The Organized Interview Guidebook for the Hamilton Rating Level with Atypical Major depression Product (SIGH-ADS) was given at 20, 30 and 36 weeks gestation from which the sleep variables were obtained. Results Stressed out women had more fragmented sleep at each assessment (p ideals .05). However, the rate of recurrence of insomnia symptoms was higher for depressed ladies only at 20 weeks gestation. SSRI use, regardless of MDD status, did significantly impact several sleep variables. Among the non-depressed women, those with short or longer sleep duration, symptoms of insomnia and long periods of nocturnal waketime experienced higher SIGH-ADS scores later in pregnancy (p ideals = .05). Conclusions At 20 and 30 weeks gestation sleep was more disturbed in stressed out pregnant women in comparison to nondepressed pregnant women. At 36 weeks, sleep was disturbed no matter major depression status or KBTBD6 SSRI use. Among the non-depressed women, disturbed sleep in conjunction with SSRI use was associated with higher depressive symptoms. 0.0083). Logistic regression models were estimated to test whether sleep actions at 20 weeks gestation among non-depressed women forecast emergent MDD at 30 and 36 weeks gestation modifying for SSRI use. In order to test the association between sleep and MDD across gestation for those ladies, a repeated actions combined logistic regression model was estimated for each sleep measure modifying for SSRI use. An connection term between sleep measure and SSRI use was estimated to adjust for the effect of SSRI on sleep. A random intercept was included in each model and the covariance across the repeated actions was assumed to be unstructured. Results Demographic characteristics of the sample are demonstrated in Table 1. The mean age of ladies was approximately 30 years. They were primarily Caucasian and about 60% were college Grosvenorine educated and currently used. The majority of women were married and more than a third were having their 1st child. Table 1 also reports demographic characteristics of ladies who had major depression or were not stressed out at 20 weeks gestation. Stressed out women were similar in age, race, and marital status to nondepressed ladies (p ideals .05), but they had more children, were less educated, and were more likely to be unemployed (p values .05). Table 1 Demographic actions of pregnant women by depression status at 20 weeks gestation. HRSD Hamilton rating scale for major depression; SIGH-ADS Organized interview guidebook for the Hamilton major depression rating level with atypical major depression supplement. NOTES: Data are offered as Mean standard deviation or quantity (percent) where appropriate. All depression actions reflect total scores less sleep item scores. Continuous actions of sleep are offered in moments. *Defined mainly because having at least one of the following symptoms: nightly difficulty falling asleep, waking during the night (except for voiding), and waking up early, unable to get back to sleep. ?100 * time sleeping/time in bed. Among the women who were stressed out, a considerable quantity were taking antidepressant medication at some point during the pregnancy. Thus, we compared the sleep between women who were taking medications and those Grosvenorine who were not taking medications (Table 3). At 20 weeks gestation, ladies who were taking an SSRI spent more time awake at night (p = .007), spent more time napping (p = .04), spent more time in bed (p Grosvenorine = .0005), and had poorer sleep efficiency (p = .05) than ladies not taking an SSRI. At 30 weeks gestation, ladies taking an SSRI required significantly longer to fall asleep (p = .0003), spent more time awake at night (p = .04), and had reduce sleep effectiveness (p = .003) than ladies not taking an SSRI. Related patterns were again noted at 36 weeks. Women taking an SSRI required significantly longer to fall asleep (p = .003), spent more time awake at night (p = .04), and had reduce sleep effectiveness (p = .04) than ladies not taking an SSRI. Table 3 Major depression and sleep actions among pregnant women by SSRI status at 20, 30, and 36 weeks gestation. HRSD Hamilton rating scale for major depression; SIGH-ADS Organized interview guidebook for the Hamilton major depression rating level with atypical major depression supplement. NOTES: Data are offered as Mean standard deviation or quantity (percent) where appropriate All depression actions reflect total.