Background Mortality rate for breast malignancy is higher among African American (AA) ladies than for ladies of additional racial/ethnic organizations. annual household incomes < $25,000, the odds of achieving or partially achieving the guideline for fruits & vegetables was 75.4% less than for participants with incomes > $50,000 (OR= 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.80). Poor physical functioning (OR= 38.48, 95% CI: 2.26, Z-WEHD-FMK IC50 656.58), sleep disturbances (OR= 60.84, 95% CI: 1.61, 2296.02), and income > $50,000 (OR= 51.02, 95% CI: 1.13, 2311.70) were associated with meeting the guideline for red and processed meat. Conclusions Many AA breast cancer survivors are not meeting the nutrition-related malignancy prevention guidelines. For this populace, more interventions that enhance access to and usage of healthy diet programs are needed. Keywords: African People in america, breast cancer survivors, nourishment guidelines, adherence, health- related quality of life INTRODUCTION Breast malignancy is common among African American (AA) ladies and for this populace, the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality (American Malignancy Society (ACS), 2016). Racial-ethnic disparities have emerged for ladies diagnosed with breast Z-WEHD-FMK IC50 cancer; relative to white ladies, AA women possess lower incidence rates but a 42% higher mortality rate (DeSantis et al., ENPP3 2016). Although breast cancer mortality has been reducing since 1990, the decrease is less for AA ladies than for white ladies, accentuating the racial-ethnic disparity and stressing the importance of working with this populace (DeSantis et al., 2016). The National Health and Nourishment Examination Study (NHANES) analyzed styles in obesity between 1999 and 2010, and during this time, obesity in AA ladies improved (Flegal et al., 2012). Obesity may increase risk of developing cancer and malignancy recurrence (Kushi et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2015). Z-WEHD-FMK IC50 Protani et al. (2010) found that breast malignancy survivors (BCSs) who have been obese experienced worse survival rates than those who were not obese. Monitoring diet intake is especially important for AA BCSs because of the increased risk of obesity (Smith et al., 2015). The ACS recommendations are intended to help in keeping a healthy excess weight, reducing malignancy recurrence, and increasing survival. It is recommended that BCSs consume at least 2.5 cups (5 servings) of vegetables and fruits daily, select whole grains instead of refined grains, and limit usage of red meat and processed meat (Kushi et al., 2012). Factors that may influence diet include health-related quality of life Z-WEHD-FMK IC50 (HR-QoL), age, employment, education, income, and marital status (Smith et al., 2015). HR-QoL steps include anxiety, major depression, fatigue, and pain intensity. Obesity correlates with a lower HR-QoL, which may influence survival results (Cohen et al., 2016; Andersen, 2002) and there is an association between diet and HR-QoL (Milte et al., 2015; Cohen et al., 2016; Track et al., 2015). Adults over the age of 50 are at a greater risk of eating an unhealthy diet and of developing cancer (ACS, 2016). Time and money are barriers to healthy eating (Macdiarmid et al. 2013). Individuals daily schedules, such as going to work, may be a barrier to preparing healthy meals. Additionally, solitary and high-income earners are more likely to consume convenience food (Lee & Lin 2012). Individuals who have a higher education and live with a spouse or children are likely to consume healthier diet programs (Skuland 2015). The present investigation wanted to determine, for a sample of AA BCSs, the factors that forecast adherence to nutrition-related malignancy prevention recommendations. Although previous studies have used diet like a predictor of HR-QoL (Blanchard et al., 2008), we examined a bi-directional effect. METHODS Participants Following IRB approval from your Morehouse School of Medicine, 240 BCSs were recruited for the study by convenience sampling from Survivors Including Supporters to Take Action in Advancing Health (SISTAAH) Talk, a BCS support group. Following consent, survivors completed a lifestyle assessment tool (LAT), and data were collected from 2013 to 2015. Methods The 30-minute LAT was completed self-administered via email or postal mail; or facilitator-administered in-person or by telephone. The questionnaire consisted of demographic factors, breast malignancy analysis and treatment Z-WEHD-FMK IC50 history; HR-QoL; weight history; physical activity; diet intake; overall health; and breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. The present report utilized the HR-QoL and diet intake components of the LAT. End result Variables The diet intake section of the LAT consisted of 25 items. Participants indicated usage frequencies of various food items per month in terms of days or weeks. The dietary intake section was divided into categories relating to the ACS.